Operational Closure
&
Entrainment

 Operational Closure

Marvin Mynsky:
" Why are
[mental]processes so hard to classify? In earlier times, we could usually judge machines and processes by how they transformed raw materials into finished products.
[Input==>Processing==>Output]

But it makes no sense to speak of brains as though they manufacture thoughts the way factories make cars.

The difference is that brains use processes that change themselves - and this means we cannot separate such processes from the products they produce...

The principal activities of brains are making changes in themselves.

Because the whole idea of self-modifying processes is new to our experience, we cannot yet trust our commonsense judgment about such matters."

Implications for the nature of knowledge.

Entrainment and Coupling and Coordination

Not some random operational closure but operational closure closure that works the way the rest of the universe works

Integrat.ed1

Tidal Locking of Moon and Earth.

Not an input--- processing ----output model

 

Intro
Meta-Principles in a Batesonian Epistemology
Beowulf & Grendel
Methodological Issues
Mapping Bateson's Difference-based Epistemology onto Boolean Nets
An Overview of E42